±«ÓãÖ±²¥

Peter Watson

±·²¹³¾±ð:ÌýPeter Watson, MSc

Level at MPU:ÌýPhD

·¡³¾²¹¾±±ô:Ìýpeter.watson [at] mail.mcgill.ca

³§³Ü±è±ð°ù±¹¾±²õ´Ç°ù(²õ):ÌýDr. Jan Seuntjens

Research interests:ÌýKilovoltage dosimetry, Intraoperative radiotherapy, Electronic brachytherapy

Ìý

Research summary

The INTRABEAM system (Carl Zeiss, Germany) is a miniature x-ray source for use in intraoperativeÌýradiotherapy and brachytherapy. Currently, this source is calibrated in a relative way using an indirectÌýmeasurement of absorbed dose (energy per unit mass). The absolute primary standard for measuringÌýabsorbed dose from ionizing radiation is calorimetry, whereby dose is measured directly viaÌýtemperature change of a medium. Thus, the ideal calibration technique for miniature x-ray sourcesÌýwould be calorimetry-based. The purpose of this project is to evaluate the current dosimetry formalismÌýof the INTRABEAM system, and to develop a calorimetry-based absorbed dose protocol for theseÌýsources.Ìý

A monte carlo model of the INTRABEAM source has been developed and validated in-air using theÌýEGSnrc particle transport code. Using this model, ionization chamber correction and conversionÌýfactors can be accurately calculated for the INTRABEAM source, and compared with accepted values.ÌýNext, the feasibility of performing a calorimetric dose measurement with the INTRABEAM source willÌýbe investigated. A protoype calorimeter will then be constructed, and characterised in terms ofÌýstability and noise. Once characterised, dose measurements with the calorimeter will be performed andÌýcompared with ionization chamber and radiochromic film measurements.ÌýThe establishment of a calorimetry-based dose protocol for miniature x-ray sources, such as theÌýINTRABEAM system, would help reduce dosimetric uncertainties. This increased confidence inÌýdelivered dose would allow for direct comparison between INTRABEAM and other existingÌýcommercial miniature x-ray devices. It would also assist with investigating the use of INTRABEAM atÌýdifferent cancer sites in the body, and for combining INTRABEAM treatments with external beamÌýradiotherapy. Most importantly, reducing the uncertainty of delivered dose will ultimately lead toÌýimproving patient outcome.

Ìý

Key publications

  1. Watson, P., Mainegra-Hing, E., Tomic, N., & Seuntjens, J. (2015). Implementation of an efficient Monte Carlo calculation for CBCT scatter correction: phantom study. Journal Of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 16(4). doi:10.1120/jacmp.v16i4.5393

Ìý

Awards

±«ÓãÖ±²¥ Physics Graduate Fellowship (2013)

Research Institute of the MUHC Studentship (2011)

NSERC Undergraduate Research Award (declined) (2006)

Back to top